Skip to main content

Ignatius to the Magnesians 13

1 verses • Lightfoot Greek (Apostolic Fathers, 1885)

Translator's Introduction

What This Chapter Is About

Ignatius closes the doctrinal section of the letter with a closing exhortation: be established in the doctrines of the Lord and the apostles, and be subject to the bishop. The chapter is largely pastoral but contains one of Ignatius's signature ecclesiological formulas: the church should 'prosper in flesh and in spirit, in faith and love, in Son and Father and Spirit' — an early triadic-doxological pattern that, while not yet the developed Nicene trinitarian formula, structures Christian doxology around the three divine persons.

What Makes This Chapter Remarkable

Ign. Magn. 13's triadic doxological pattern 'in Son and Father and Spirit' (ἐν υἱῷ καὶ πατρὶ καὶ ἁγίῳ πνεύματι — note the unusual order Son-Father-Spirit, distinct from the Matthean Father-Son-Spirit baptismal formula at Matt 28:19) is one of the earliest extant pre-Nicene triadic-doxological constructions. The order itself is theologically interesting: Ignatius regularly leads with the Son in his doxologies, reflecting the Son-centered theological-economic focus of his Christology — the church knows the Father THROUGH the Son and is sanctified BY the Spirit, so the experiential-economic order is Son first.

Translation Friction

The Son-Father-Spirit order has occasionally been read as evidence of subordinationism (the Son is somehow primary). This is a misreading. Ignatius's order is not ontological but doxological-economic: the church encounters the Son first (in incarnation, sacrament, witness), then through the Son comes to the Father (in trinitarian relation), with the Spirit as the agent of incorporation. The order matches the Pauline doxological habit of 1 Corinthians 12:4-6 (Spirit-Lord-God order) and is consistent with NT-internal triadic constructions that vary order without compromising the equality of the three persons.

Connections

Matthew 28:19 (Father-Son-Spirit baptismal formula); 1 Corinthians 12:4-6 (Spirit-Lord-God triadic order); 2 Corinthians 13:14 (Christ-God-Spirit triadic blessing); 1 Peter 1:2 (Father-Spirit-Christ triadic ordering); Didache 7:1-3 (the trinitarian baptismal formula in liturgical practice — to be authored in future TCR step); Ignatius to the Ephesians 9:1 (parallel triadic pattern); Justin Martyr, 1 Apology 61 (the Father-Son-Spirit baptismal formula in early-Christian liturgical practice); Council of Constantinople 381 (the dogmatic resolution of the trinitarian formula); future Pillar III doctrinal-index entry: 'The Trinity (formal Nicene-Constantinopolitan formulation vs. pre-Nicene triadic constructions).'

Ignatius to the Magnesians 13:1

σπουδάζετε οὖν βεβαιωθῆναι ἐν τοῖς δόγμασιν τοῦ κυρίου καὶ τῶν ἀποστόλων, ἵνα πάντα ὅσα ποιεῖτε κατευοδωθῆτε σαρκὶ καὶ πνεύματι, πίστει καὶ ἀγάπῃ, ἐν υἱῷ καὶ πατρὶ καὶ ἁγίῳ πνεύματι, ἐν ἀρχῇ καὶ ἐν τέλει.

Be zealous, then, to be established in the teachings of the Lord and the apostles, so that in everything you do you may prosper — in flesh and spirit, in faith and love, in Son and Father and Holy Spirit, in beginning and in end.

REF Be eager, then, to be confirmed in the doctrines of the Lord and the apostles, that you may prosper in all things that you do, in flesh and spirit, in faith and love, in Son and Father and Holy Spirit, in beginning and end. (Schaff, ANF I, p. 63, paraphrased)

Notes & Key Terms 2 terms

Key Terms

δόγματα dogmata
"doctrines / teachings" fixed teachings, established doctrines; in classical-philosophical usage, the propositions of a philosophical school

Same noun used in classical philosophical doxographies for the established teachings of Stoics, Epicureans, etc. Ignatius's application to 'the doctrines of the Lord and the apostles' positions Christianity as a school of established teaching with apostolic transmission — anticipating the regula fidei tradition (Tertullian, De praescr. 13) and the later Christian conciliar-dogma vocabulary.

ἐν υἱῷ καὶ πατρὶ καὶ ἁγίῳ πνεύματι en hyiō kai patri kai hagiō pneumati
"in Son and Father and Holy Spirit" Ignatius's signature Son-first triadic doxological order; the comprehensive scope of Christian flourishing under the three divine persons

The Son-leading order is distinctive of Ignatius. The order is doxological-economic (reflecting how the church experientially encounters the divine economy — Son first through incarnation, then Father through Son, with Spirit as agent of incorporation), not ontological-hierarchical. The Nicene-Constantinopolitan dogmatic resolution will canonize the Father-Son-Spirit ordering for confessional purposes while preserving the doxological-economic Son-leading pattern in liturgical practice (e.g., the Gloria Patri's variable order across Eastern and Western rites).

Translator Notes

  1. Lightfoot II.2, pp. 134-136 (Ign. Magn. 13:1); Schaff, ANF I, p. 63. The chapter's closing exhortation gathers the letter's pastoral and doctrinal threads into a single sentence. βεβαιωθῆναι ἐν τοῖς δόγμασιν τοῦ κυρίου καὶ τῶν ἀποστόλων ('be established in the doctrines of the Lord and the apostles') is the early-Christian articulation of what later theology will call the regula fidei — the rule of faith handed down from Christ through the apostles and articulated by the church's teaching authority.
  2. The triadic-doxological order 'in Son and Father and Holy Spirit' (ἐν υἱῷ καὶ πατρὶ καὶ ἁγίῳ πνεύματι) is unusual — the canonical-NT triadic formulas typically lead with the Father (Matt 28:19) or with the Spirit/Lord (1 Cor 12:4-6, 2 Cor 13:14). Ignatius's Son-leading order reflects his theological focus on the Son as the locus of divine self-disclosure (cf. Ign. Magn. 8:2 — the Father 'manifested himself through Jesus Christ his Son'). The order is doxological-economic, not ontological-hierarchical.
  3. Schoedel 1985 reads the triadic pattern here as 'pre-credal' — Ignatius is operating with the conceptual furniture that will later be codified at Nicaea and Constantinople but is using it in a more pastoral-doxological register than dogmatic-confessional. The three persons are named together as the comprehensive scope of Christian flourishing; the relations among them are not yet the focus.
  4. Cross-reference Matt 28:19 (the trinitarian baptismal formula); 1 Cor 12:4-6, 2 Cor 13:14, 1 Pet 1:2 (other NT triadic constructions); and (for Step 6b-and-later authoring) Ign. Smyrn. 8:2 + Didache 7:1-3 for the parallel liturgical-baptismal trinitarian patterns. The future Pillar III doctrinal-index entry on the Trinity will gather all these pre-Nicene constructions together as evidence for the developed trinitarian theology Nicaea will eventually canonize.