λόγος δὲ ὁ ὑπεράνω τούτων ἁπάντων ἀσώματος, εἰκὼν τοῦ θεοῦ, ὁ πρεσβύτατος καὶ γενικώτατος τῶν ὅσα γέγονεν, ἐγγυτάτω τοῦ μόνου ἀψευδῶς ὄντος ἀδιαστάτως ἐστηκώς. ἔστι γὰρ ὁ λόγος ὥσπερ ἡνίοχος δυνάμεων, ὁ δὲ προσδιακυβερνῶν ὁ ἐφ' ὑψηλοῦ καθεζόμενος.
The Logos, which is above all these and incorporeal, is the image of God — the most ancient and most generic of the things that have come to be — standing nearest to the only One who truly exists, without any separating distance. For the Logos is, as it were, charioteer of the Powers; the one who utters the Logos is the rider, directing the charioteer from above.
REF The Word, which is above all these and bodiless, is the image of God, the most ancient and most generic of created things, standing closest to the only One who truly exists, separated by no division. For the Logos is, as it were, the charioteer of the Powers, and he who utters it is the rider, directing the charioteer from above. (Colson, Loeb V, pp. 64-67)
Notes & Key Terms 4 terms
Key Terms
Plato's term for the rational soul in Phaedrus 246a-b. Philo transposes the image from soul-governance to cosmic governance: the Logos as charioteer drives the Powers as Plato's charioteer drove the two horses. The image is a Greek philosophical commonplace pressed into Hellenistic Jewish theological service.
Capitalized 'Powers' signals Philo's quasi-hypostatic use — same as at Cher. §§27-28. The two principal Powers are the creative and the kingly, but Philo allows for more in different contexts. Here the Powers are the team the Logos-charioteer drives.
Technical Philonic term. The Logos is γενικώτατος because all other created realities are species of which it is the genus. The conceptual move anticipates Plotinus's One-Nous-Soul ontology and the medieval doctrine of universals.
Philo's term for the Logos's proximity to God: no διάστημα (interval) separates the Logos from the One Who Is. The same word will appear in Athanasius's anti-Arian arguments to deny any ontological gap between the Father and the Son.
Translator Notes
- Cohn-Wendland III, p. 130; Loeb V, pp. 64-67 (Colson, 1934). §101 articulates Philo's governance-by-instrument hierarchy in maximum compression: God is the rider, the Logos is the charioteer, the Powers are the chariot-team, the cosmos is the chariot being driven. Each rank acts only through the rank below it. God himself never touches the world directly; the Logos handles the Powers; the Powers handle the cosmos.
- The charioteer image (ἡνίοχος) was the metaphor the original Step 2 brief mistakenly placed at Leg. III.96 — the actual Leg. III.96 content is the shadow / instrument exegesis of Bezaleel. The genuine charioteer passage is here at Fug. §101 (with a parallel at Migr. §67). Step 3 corrects the placement by authoring §101 in its proper location.
- εἰκὼν τοῦ θεοῦ ('image of God') and πρεσβύτατος τῶν ὅσα γέγονεν ('most ancient of the things that have come to be') in the same breath: §101 packs together the two Christological predicates of Spec. I.§81 (image-of-God Logos) and Migr. §6 (most-ancient produced reality). The cross-reference pattern across these three §sections is one of the strongest pieces of evidence that Philo's Logos doctrine is a single coherent structure expressed in many local idioms.
- ἐγγυτάτω τοῦ μόνου ἀψευδῶς ὄντος — 'standing nearest to the only One who truly exists' — is the maximally close formulation Philo allows. The Logos is as near to God as anything can be without being God. This is the formula Origen reads in De Princ. I.2.10 (the Son's perfect proximity to the Father) and that the Nicene Creed will eventually replace with ὁμοούσιος ('of one substance').
- Plato's Phaedrus 246a-b uses the charioteer image for the rational part of the soul controlling the two horses of spirit and appetite. Philo redeploys the Platonic image at the cosmic scale: the Logos as charioteer is not driving an individual soul but driving the divine Powers themselves. The transposition from psychological to cosmological is Philo's distinctive contribution.